Thailand house speaker ponders public input on casino bill debate
Thailand’s House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha (as depicted in featured image) has called for comprehensive public discussions on the government’s proposed casino-entertainment complex, urging all sides to weigh its economic benefits against social concerns.
Speaking at a seminar organised by a House committee on anti-drug trafficking and anti-money laundering, Mr Wan acknowledged the conflicting views on the project. While the government argues that a legalised casino sector could boost tourism and economic growth, opponents warn of an increase in gambling addiction and related social problems.
“Illegal gambling dens still exist in remote provinces, despite strict prohibitions. This is a fact that cannot be ignored,” said Wan Muhamad. He stopped short of expressing his own stance on the matter but insisted that the public must be involved in the decision-making process.
Bill delayed amid opposition
The proposal, which has been under discussion in recent months, has sparked fresh debate, with strong opposition from some sectors of society. The bill was scheduled for cabinet deliberation on 11 March 2025. However, it was not discussed as planned, delaying its progress.
Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra stressed that the proposal should not be rushed, calling for a thorough review of its legal and economic implications. She reiterated that public input, including from those opposed to the bill, must be considered.
A key provision of the proposal is the requirement for Thai citizens to have at least 50 million baht (€1.31 million) in their bank accounts for six months before being allowed entry into casinos. However, due to the ongoing scepticism, the proposal has been dropped. Critics argue that this restriction excessively benefits wealthy individuals while doing little to curb the risks of addiction.
Meanwhile, the the proposed casino entry fee of 5,000 baht (€136) remains in the draft lawThe Council of State, the government’s legal advisory body, confirmed that the minimum savings requirement remains unchanged for now. Any amendments, according to Secretary-General Pakorn Nilpraphun, would be under the Ministry of Finance’s authority.
Protests and public reaction
The proposal has also triggered protests from politicians, students and anti-gambling activists, who fear that legalisation could normalise gambling and exacerbate addiction problems. Demonstrations have taken place in Bangkok and other major cities, with protesters carrying banners warning of the dangers of gambling.
Several protesters have also called for better government initiatives to address illegal gambling rather than introducing legal casinos.
Meanwhile, the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) has sought to reassure the public by confirming its role in overseeing financial transparency within gaming complexes. Casino operators will be required to submit financial reports to AMLO, which will inspect them for signs of illicit activities.
The delay in cabinet discussions has left the fate of the casino bill uncertain. While some lawmakers support the move, citing potential economic benefits, others remain sceptical. The government has signalled that further studies will be conducted before any final decision is made.
