Northern Cyprus is at the centre of a heated debate following the introduction of a landmark bill that could dramatically alter the nation’s casino laws. For the first time, Turkish Cypriots holding a specific TRNC identity card may be allowed to enter casinos in the region, breaking a long-standing restriction.
The proposed legislation, introduced by the ruling coalition government, has sparked fierce criticism from opposition figures and ignited broader discussions about gambling regulations on the island.
The new bill put forward by the ruling coalition, but revealed by opposition MP Salahi Sahiner of the Republican Turkish Party (CTP), proposes significant amendments to existing casino legislation. Among its most notable provisions is the automatic granting of casino permits to hotels with 1,000 or more beds, effectively eliminating the current cap of five casinos per company. Additionally, the amendments would relax restrictions on casino locations, allowing them to be built near schools and within town or city centres, an option previously prohibited under Northern Cyprus law.
These sweeping changes come on the heels of other gambling-related legislative updates in Northern Cyprus. Last April, the government halved casino tax rates as part of a broader tax reform initiative aimed at revitalising the industry. More recently, in December, parliament approved a betting levy intended to support football clubs in the region. However, this move also faced backlash from critics who argued it rewarded financial mismanagement within sports organisations.
The proposed legislation has not been without controversy. Salahi Sahiner has been one of its most vocal critics, expressing concerns about its potential impact on public finances and societal well-being. “These regulations will make it easier for tax payments to be delayed and for unlimited casino permits to be granted,” Sahiner stated. He went on to describe the bill as “one of the biggest mistakes in history,” accusing the government of prioritising casino interests over the welfare of Turkish Cypriot citizens during a time of economic hardship.
“The state of public finances is obvious and it has reached a point where we cannot even buy a needle without borrowing,” Sahiner remarked, highlighting the dire financial situation facing Northern Cyprus. He also warned that societal tensions were escalating dangerously: “Tension in society has practically brought us to the brink of civil war, but the Government’s only concern is to protect the interests of casinos.”
Critics argue that allowing casinos near schools and urban centres could exacerbate social issues related to gambling addiction and economic inequality. Moreover, opponents fear that loosening restrictions on casino permits may lead to unchecked expansion within an industry already fraught with regulatory challenges.
The debate surrounding this bill reflects broader divisions within Northern Cyprus over gambling policy and its role in society. While proponents see these changes as an opportunity for economic growth and increased tourism revenue, detractors view them as short-sighted measures that could deepen existing inequalities and strain public resources further.
The government’s recent decision to halve casino tax rates last year was similarly contentious, with critics questioning whether such reforms truly benefit ordinary Turkish Cypriot citizens or merely serve corporate interests. The December betting levy aimed at supporting football clubs also drew ire from opponents who argued that it incentivised poor financial management rather than addressing systemic issues within sports funding.
As discussions continue, it remains unclear whether this proposed legislation will pass or face significant resistance from lawmakers and civil society groups alike. What is certain is that this issue has reignited debates about governance priorities in Northern Cyprus, and whether economic policies are being shaped with public welfare or private profit in mind.
This unfolding story highlights how gambling legislation can serve as both a catalyst for economic reform and a flashpoint for societal conflict. Whether this bill marks progress or peril for Northern Cyprus will depend on how lawmakers balance competing interests in the weeks ahead.