Esports contested at the 2023 Asian Games

At the seminar “The Online Betting Market in Brazil: Paths to Responsible Governance,” held by the Brazilian Institute of Education, Development, and Research (IDP) last week in Brasília, the National Association of Games and Lotteries () emphasised that betting houses wishing to operate under regulation are aware of the need for best practices to ensure honest and responsible gaming in Brazil.

This point was highlighted by ANJL in response to concerns raised by other speakers regarding issues such as irregular advertising targeted at children and adolescents, and the encouragement of addiction and debt.

“Betting houses, for example, have never accepted credit cards. This is a concern of the sector. There isn't a single betting house that accepts them. We have PIX, which is a genuinely Brazilian payment method. Underage betting? We don't have that either. We are making history with great responsibility, trying to make this market a safe industry. Our mission, as an association, is to make this market the fairest and most transparent for both operators and bettors,” said Plínio.

In the same panel, with the theme “A Regulatory Agenda for Responsible Gaming,” the Secretary of Prizes and Bets of the Ministry of Finance, Regis Dudena, emphasised the importance of regulating the sector, which is still in progress, to prevent harmful practices from contaminating the regulated environment.

“The concerns have two health fronts: the first from a mental health perspective, and the second from a financial health perspective. And usually, they are associated. What seems important to me is to understand that this is an exception, although it should be handled very carefully,” said Dudena, adding that by July, the Ministry of Finance will publish ordinances on these topics, one of them in conjunction with the Ministry of Health.

“These ordinances will take care of those who, in their entertainment, want to allocate part of their assets to enjoy a specific activity namely fixed-odds betting. As long as this is entertainment, a conscious choice, we agree with this activity. When it stops being a conscious choice, something healthy for the bettor's life, it is not in the interest of the State, nor even of the operators themselves, for this person to continue participating in this system,” added the secretary.

Regis's assessment, highlighting that gambling addiction is a concern for betting houses, although statistics show that, in general, addiction affects less than 1% of bettors. Regarding advertising, ANJL president noted that the National Advertising Self-Regulation Council (Conar) has been working with the sector to define guidelines. At the beginning of this year, with contributions from ANJL, the organisation launched Annex X of the Brazilian Code of Advertising Self-Regulation, which set rules for betting advertising in Brazil.

“In this context, the illegal market is a significant concern for us. These houses do promote such things, attracting minors and encouraging credit... serious houses do not. Our commitment is to a safe and transparent market where people can have fun, and bettors are respected. Our desire is that this market can teach people how to enjoy themselves, as happens in the United States, France, and other countries,” he stated.

Upcoming SiGMA event: The  2024 will be held in Budapest this September.

In traditional British politics the line between public service and personal gain is sacrosanct. However, a recent incident has sent shockwaves through the hallowed halls of Westminster. Craig Williams, the Parliamentary Private Secretary to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, has found himself at the centre of controversy following his admission of placing a bet on the date of the general election—a decision he now profoundly regrets.

Williams, who also serves as the Conservative parliamentary candidate for Montgomeryshire, conceded to a “huge error of judgment” after it emerged that he wagered on the election timing mere days before Sunak announced it on May 22. The incident, now under the scrutiny of the Gambling Commission (GC), raises profound questions about the intersection of gambling and governance.

The GC’s inquiry into Williams’ bet was precipitated by an automatic flag from Ladbrokes, the betting company where the bet was placed. Williams, having placed a £100 bet at 5-1 odds, stood to win £500. However, his status as a “politically exposed person” meant the wager was not registered, underscoring the delicate nature of “novelty” betting markets like general elections.

The implications of Williams’ actions are far-reaching. Utilizing confidential information to gain an unfair advantage in betting could constitute a criminal offense. Moreover, the MPs’ code of conduct explicitly prohibits members from actions that could significantly tarnish the reputation and integrity of the House of Commons. The timing of the bet—while Parliament was in session—only adds to the gravity of the situation.

The bet was placed through an online account, necessitating personal details from Williams, including his date of birth and debit card information. Ladbrokes, aware of the bet’s location, has remained tight-lipped, declining to comment on the matter.

The GC, while typically reticent about ongoing investigations, has made it clear that using insider information for betting could be a criminal act. The outcome of their inquiry could have serious repercussions for Williams, who is defending a substantial majority in his constituency.

The foreign secretary, Lord David Cameron, characterized Williams’ bet as a “clearly very foolish decision,” emphasizing the need to allow the GC’s investigation to proceed without prejudice. The potential consequences, as per the GC’s powers, could be severe.

Opposition parties have seized upon the incident, urging the Tories to withdraw support for Williams. Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrat spokesperson, called for Williams’ suspension pending the GC’s findings. The controversy erupted just as Sunak was preparing for a pivotal live TV debate, adding to the challenges of an already tumultuous election campaign.

The debate itself, a face-off between Sunak and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, resulted in a perceived victory for Starmer, according to a snap poll by YouGov. The poll suggested that 64 percent of voters felt Starmer outperformed Sunak, a sentiment that could foreshadow the electoral mood.

As the campaign trail heats up, Sunak has had to counter claims of an impending Labour “supermajority.” Defence Secretary Grant Shapps even invoked the specter of a Labour victory surpassing Tony Blair’s 1997 landslide, in a bid to rally Reform voters to the Conservative cause.

Sunak, aboard the Tory election battle bus, reiterated his stance that the only poll that truly matters is the one on election day, 4 July. Meanwhile, Starmer, campaigning in Grimsby, refuted any notion of the election being a done deal, vowing to fight for every vote.

In the end, Williams’ bet has laid bare the vulnerabilities of a political system grappling with the ethics of personal conduct. As the GC continues its investigation, the reverberations of this political gamble will undoubtedly be felt long after the ballots are cast and counted. The stakes have never been higher, and the outcome of this inquiry may well redefine the boundaries of acceptable conduct within the British political arena. The public reaction to Craig Williams’ betting revelation has been one of significant concern and disapproval. The incident has been described as an “utterly extraordinary” error of judgment by political figures and has led to calls for swift action by the Gambling Commission1. The situation has been compounded by the fact that the bet was placed while Parliament was still in session, which goes against the MPs’ code of conduct that bars members from causing significant damage to the reputation and integrity of the House.

The news broke just before Prime Minister Rishi Sunak participated in a live TV debate, adding to the challenges of his election campaign. The foreign secretary, Lord David Cameron, referred to Williams’ decision to bet on the election date as a “clearly very foolish decision” and emphasized the importance of the ongoing investigation by the Gambling Commission, which has considerable powers to determine the consequences.

Opposition parties have been vocal in their criticism, with the Liberal Democrat spokesperson stating it is “incumbent” on the Prime Minister to suspend Williams while the investigation is in progress1. The controversy has certainly cast a shadow over the Conservative campaign, and the public’s trust in the political process may be shaken as a result.

Overall, the revelation has not been taken lightly by the public or political peers, and it has sparked a broader discussion about the ethics of politicians engaging in activities that could potentially exploit their access to sensitive information. The outcome of the Gambling Commission’s investigation is awaited with keen interest, as it will have implications not only for Williams but also for the integrity of political betting regulations. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has expressed his disappointment over the incident involving his aide, Craig Williams, who placed a bet on the general election date. Sunak’s response to the controversy was to highlight his disapproval of Williams’ actions. He stated that he found the situation “very disappointing” and emphasized that such behaviour was not in line with the expectations of conduct for someone in Williams’ position.

The Prime Minister’s reaction indicates the seriousness with which he views the breach of trust and the potential implications it has for the integrity of his office and the political process. Sunak’s acknowledgment of the incident and his expression of disappointment serve as an official stance on the matter, reflecting the gravity of the situation and the expectation of high ethical standards within his administration. The ongoing investigation by the Gambling Commission will likely shed more light on the details and consequences of the bet placed by Williams.

The jurisdiction of Gibraltar, a British Overseas Territory located on the southern coast of Spain, is a subject of ongoing international debate and interest due to its unique geopolitical, historical, and economic context. The interplay between Gibraltar's historical sovereignty disputes, its right to self-determination, and its modern financial regulations demonstrates the complexities faced by this territory.

Gibraltar has been under British control since the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713, which ceded the territory from Spain to Britain. Its strategic importance at the entrance to the Mediterranean Sea has made it a valuable military and geopolitical asset. Despite its long-standing status as a British territory, Spain has consistently contested Gibraltar's sovereignty, citing historical claims. However, the residents of Gibraltar have shown a clear preference to remain under British sovereignty, as demonstrated by referendums in 1967 and 2002, where the overwhelming majority voted against Spanish sovereignty.

The principle of self-determination is a key aspect of international law, asserting that peoples have the right to determine their political status and pursue their development. Gibraltar's classification as a non-self-governing territory by the United Nations adds a layer of complexity to this issue. Spain's argument for reclaiming Gibraltar often hinges on decolonization, suggesting that the territory should be integrated with Spain. Conversely, the Gibraltarians' right to self-determination supports their desire to maintain the current political status under British sovereignty. This conflict illustrates the tensions between historical territorial claims and modern principles of self-determination.

Gibraltar's tax regime has positioned it as an attractive destination for businesses, particularly in the gambling and financial sectors. The favourable tax rates and regulatory environment have spurred economic growth and created employment opportunities within the territory. However, this has also led to criticism from international bodies and other nations, calling for greater transparency and stricter regulatory measures to prevent financial malpractices such as tax evasion and money laundering.

Greylisting and financial scrutiny

In June 2022, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) placed Gibraltar on its 'grey list', highlighting deficiencies in the territory's efforts to enforce regulatory sanctions and final confiscation judgments. Being on this list indicates increased monitoring and implies that Gibraltar must enhance its financial regulatory framework to avoid further reputational and economic damage.as it may affect the ease with which businesses in Gibraltar can engage in international transactions, and it places pressure on the territory to demonstrate substantial improvements in financial oversight and enforcement.

Gibraltar’s exit from the FATF grey list marks a significant stride in its regulatory compliance, particularly in anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism. This development reinforces Gibraltar’s reputation as a secure jurisdiction for international business, especially in the online gaming industry. The territory’s focused efforts to meet the FATF’s criteria demonstrate its commitment to maintaining high standards of financial conduct, ensuring continued economic growth and stability.

The jurisdiction of Gibraltar remains a contentious and multifaceted issue, involving historical sovereignty disputes, the right to self-determination, and contemporary financial regulation challenges. Gibraltar's favourable tax environment and its recent greylisting by the FATF highlight the ongoing need for robust financial oversight and transparency. As Gibraltar faces these challenges, the international community continues to scrutinize its actions, recognizing the broader implications for issues of sovereignty, self-governance, and financial integrity.

Understanding the evolving dynamics in Gibraltar is crucial for comprehending the broader context of international law, finance, and politics. The territory's future will likely be shaped by its ability to balance the historical claims and desires of its residents with the demands for greater financial regulation and international compliance.

Stop Press: Find out more about  to be held in Budapest.

As the Euro 24 tournament kicks off, the French National Gaming Authority (ANJ) acknowledges the efforts made by gambling companies to tackle addiction while launching a new awareness campaign.

More than half of the French population plans to follow the Euro football tournament, which runs from June 14 to July 14. Among these viewers, over a third intend to bet, according . This study conducted in May 2024 reveals that while more than half of those planning to follow the Euro consider making friendly bets with friends and family, 35% intend to wager money on the matches, a proportion that rises to 44% among those under 35 years old.

Three years ago, during the previous Euro, 700 million euros were generated in bets in France, both online and at retail outlets. The following year, during the 2022 World Cup in Qatar where the French team reached the final, bets rose to 900 million euros.

The regulator predicts that total bets could set a new record during Euro 2024, potentially reaching one billion euros, with the performance of the French team likely being a significant factor in the betting amounts.

With over 4 billion euros in online bets in 2023, football continues to dominate as the most , accounting for 52% of all wagers, followed by tennis and basketball.

About 64% of sports bettors are between 18 and 34 years old, notes the ANJ, which launched an ambitious prevention campaign on the risks of sports betting addiction on June 13, the day before the Euro starts.

The ANJ's campaign focuses on the legal notices in gambling advertisements, aiming to highlight the risks of sports betting addiction by replacing the usual legal jargon with real-life stories of addiction. The campaign also directs individuals to various tools for assessing their gambling habits and accessing advice and support services.

"Since the excesses of the Euro in 2021, gambling operators have become aware of their responsibilities in fighting excessive gambling and have adjusted their practices," noted Isabelle Falque-Pierrotin, president of the ANJ, in a . "This positive momentum must continue during the Euro and the Olympics, and the ANJ will be vigilant about the practices of each operator," she cautioned.

In April 2024, the ANJ had already acknowledged "significant progress across the entire market in terms of preventing excessive gambling", as well as an "improvement of protection standards for identifying and assisting excessive gamblers." The report adds that "most operators have implemented more individualised support measures. Most exclude the highest-risk identified players from commercial incentives."

Upcoming SiGMA event: The  2024 will be held in Budapest this September.